Search for: "Brown v. Hughes" Results 161 - 180 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgment was reserved by the Court of Appeal in Cambridge v Makin on Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 2 or Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ) will hear the appeal in the case of Cambridge v Makin. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
  The panel will be Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
” Ex  parte Wakliee Brown, 2011 Ala. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:14 pm
Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput has written an essay on the Supreme Court's decision last week in Brown, Governor of California, et al. v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:48 pm by INFORRM
Shandil v Sharma, Mundine v Brown, Holmes v Fraser, Ryan v Premachandran, PK v BV, Moumoutzakis v Carpino, Pak v The Korean Times, Woolcott v Seeger, – four NSW Supreme Court, three NSW District Court, one WA Supreme Court. $20,000 – $50,000. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am by INFORRM
  The speakers will be Mark Lewis, Jonathan Coad, Professor Alastair Mullis and Hugh Tomlinson QC. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
 ([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by INFORRM
One of the most bizarre stories of the week concerns a secret tape recording made by actor Hugh Grant of former “News of the World”  journalist Paul McMullan boasting of his phone hacking activities in the past. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba  v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
  Desmond Browne QC representing Mark Lewis submitted that the allegations complained of were plainly defamatory and serious allegations and that Police as a public authority could not rely upon qualified privilege following recent authority (see Clift v Slough BC [2010] EWCA Civ 1484). [read post]