Search for: "Brown v. King*" Results 161 - 180 of 917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Gibson, Matrix.
It will be for the seven Justices (Lords Phillips, Hope, Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown and Clarke, and Sir John Dyson SCJ) hearing the appeals in these two parallel cases finally to determine the relationship of the Upper Tribunal to the courts in England and in Scotland respectively and, thus, whether the English and Scottish stories shall share the same ending. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
These appeals are being heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Judge, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in the Bland case [1993] AC 789 , 877, the questions for us are questions of law, “[but] behind the questions of law lie moral, ethical, medical and practical issues of fundamental importance to society”. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Habeas Relief Denied; Trial Court's Jury Charge Is Deemed Constitutionally Permissible Brown v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am by Steven Calabresi
Barber Professor of Law at Northwestern University and Visiting Professor of Political Science at Brown University 2010-2018. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
 Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for… [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:11 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Gayle (352 U.S. 903, 1956), that segregation on Alabama’s intrastate buses was unconstitutional, citing Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am by Ben
In Baigent v Random House Mr Brown admitted that he had referred to HBHG in the course of research for his book but denied copyright infringement. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:08 am by Amy Howe
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times weighs in on Kerry v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The Supreme Court is considering the issue in Manchester CC v Pinnock, in which it heard oral argument earlier this year but in which written submissions on the effect of the decision in Kay v UK have been invited, and three other cases, Hounslow LBC v Powell, Leeds CC v Hall and Frisby v Birmingham CC, have been listed in the Supreme Court in late November raising the same or overlapping issue. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
Wade or maybe all the way back to Brown v. [read post]