Search for: "Brown v. State of Delaware." Results 161 - 180 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am by Kedar
Brown-Ferris Indus. of Vermont v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
I only have so much time, so I’m going to do the state-wide judicial elections (Supreme, Commonwealth, and Superior Courts) and then the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia, Montgomery, Bucks, Chester and Delaware Counties. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Law Lady
Abuse & Neglect: NEGLECT FINDING REQUIRES PROOF OF MENTAL STATE, DELAWARE SUPREME COURT FINDS, Dep't of Health & Social Servs. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:30 am by Janet Lindenmuth
Ch. 1952), aff’d, 91 A.2d 137 (Del. 1952) (which eventually became part of Brown v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:18 am by Morris James Delaware
" Although the Delaware Supreme Court has not yet directly addressed whether fiduciary duties apply to unincorporated entities by default, it has held — in the 2010 case Nemec v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Louis University Law School COMMENTS: Elsa Barkley Brown, University of Maryland; Susan K. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm by Nietzer
In determining whether or not the judgment will be enforced, the court will evaluate what “comity,” as defined in Hilton v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm by Zoe Tillman
Administration for International Development that Contreras helped move to a settlement in the late 1990s, Evans et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:59 am by Allan Erbsen
Brown addressing personal jurisdiction in state courts is that the opinion is missing much of the nuance that would be helpful in extrapolating the holding to future cases. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:00 am
The district court observed, “At the time of his injury, Brown worked not for the NFL, but for the Cleveland Browns Football Company, a Delaware limited partnership and an entirely separate entity which happens to be a member of the NFL. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 4:00 pm by Ryan M. Rodenberg
Likewise, Chief Judge Brown quoted FW/PBS, Inc. v. [read post]