Search for: "Browne v. State Bar" Results 161 - 180 of 1,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am by Emma Svoboda
On April 19, the Supreme Court delivered a decision in Türkiye Halk Bankasi S.A. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Ronald Mann
This is the second decision in the past month, following Wilkins v United States, reversing a lower court holding that a particular statute is jurisdictional, ruling instead that the statute is merely a “precondition to relief. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 7:27 pm by Kalvis Golde
Brown, which upheld a nearly identical California ban on conversion therapy. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Jan. 13 conference; apparently held after the Jan. 20 conference) Brown v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm by Gabriel Chin
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm by Dani Selby
Together, they applied for admission to the Iowa bar in 1869, despite a state law limiting admittance to the bar to white males over the age of 21. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
Together, they applied for admission to the Iowa bar in 1869, despite a state law limiting admittance to the bar to white males over the age of 21. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:30 am by Amy Howe
CSX Transportation, a challenge to an Ohio Supreme Court decision holding that federal law trumps a state law that bars a stopped train from blocking a public road for more than five minutes. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:40 am by John Elwood
(rescheduled before the Jan. 13 conference; relisted after the Jan. 20, Feb. 17, Feb. 24 and Mar. 3 conferences) Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by John Elwood
(rescheduled before the Jan. 13 conference; relisted after the Jan. 20, Feb. 17 and Feb. 24 conferences) Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
West, the Court held that notwithstanding deferential review with regard to facts and what amounted to deferential review as to law via Teague, state court applications of law to fact would continue to be reviewed de novo per the earlier holding of Brown v. [read post]