Search for: "Browning v. Baker" Results 161 - 180 of 400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am by Jamie Baker
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 6:26 pm by Neil Siegel
Board of Education to the subsequent per curiams, from Baker v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:48 am by Mark Graber
Wade) or 1953 (the year before Brown). [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
And Vanda Felbab-Brown took a look at U.S. efforts to build partner capacity and militias abroad. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
’” In terms of the long view of Supreme Court history, wasn’t the progressive spirit of the Warren Court – exemplified in decisions such as Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The balance between privacy and transparency in regard to disclosing MPs’ expenses was comprehensively settled by the High Court in 2008, following a trilogy of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) appeals in the then Information Tribunal: Leapman [pdf], Baker [pdf] and Moffat [pdf]. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:53 am by Alex R. McQuade
Robert Chesney provided us with another Apple v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
Baker, 15-457, which asks whether a federal appeals court has jurisdiction to review an order denying a class certification after the named plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss their individual claims with prejudice; McDonnell v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Brown, 14-10186, claims that prison officials were religiously unkind to him in an unlawful manner, denying him the ability to meet and worship with other inmates because he could not muster a minyan of ten men prison officials claim is required for group worship. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Baker 15-457Issue: Whether a federal court of appeals has jurisdiction to review an order denying class certification after the named plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss their claims with prejudice. [read post]