Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 161 - 180
of 34,293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
"An applicant for accident disability retirement benefits has the burden of establishing that a disability is causally connected to a performance of duty accident" (Matter of Singleton v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 208 AD3d 882, 882). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
"An applicant for accident disability retirement benefits has the burden of establishing that a disability is causally connected to a performance of duty accident" (Matter of Singleton v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 208 AD3d 882, 882). [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am
Warsame v Hounslow LBC (2000) WLR 696 on s.193(7) considered. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
” In re Marriage of Harnack, 2022 IL App (1st) 210143 Contempt is when “[a] party who understands the court’s order but chooses to ignore the mandate” Killion v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:38 am
The car owners in this case had argued that due process does give them a right to a prompt hearing under Mathews v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., LP v Service Empls. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., LP v Service Empls. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
(Reason)Today, in Culley v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:32 am
Today's U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Furthermore, while most potential sanctions targets have probably already been analyzed by OFAC, the process of preparing a formal analysis of whether each person and entity not listed is eligible for listing is likely to be a significant burden on OFAC’s targeting staff. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:05 pm
In 1989 in Michael H. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:09 pm
Zircon Corp. v. [read post]