Search for: "Burrows v. State of La*"
Results 161 - 180
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
In India, a part of this area is codified in sections 68-72 of the Contract Act, 1872, and some outstanding judgments of the High Courts, particularly before and around the 1950s (see for example Damodara Mudaliar v Secretary of State for India, Nallaya Goundar v Ramaswami Goundar and Maniagaran v Maniagaran), contain valuable accounts of how, if at all, the common law principles have been modified by the Indian legislature. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
Keynote speaker is Ursula Kinkeldey (former chair of the relevant EPO Technical Board (3.3.04) and member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal), supported by Nina White (Boult Wade Tennant) and Robert Burrows (Bristows). [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
Here is her take on the matters in Bender Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP v Simon ; 2011 NY Slip Op 32923(U);November 4, 2011; Sup Ct, NY County;Docket Number: 100358/06 ;Judge: Debra A. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm
Ramos v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:40 am
From Meshwerks, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
EU Member States are then invited to make observations on the case. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm
As Justice Kennedy stated in Gonzales v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 11:50 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:13 am
Burrows v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:33 pm
App. 1993); Burrows v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 5:39 pm
In the Texas Supreme Court’s landmark fee-forfeiture decision, Burrow v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
However, many legal commentators have stated that Gawker had nowhere to run following a 1985 US Supreme Court decision of Harper & Row Publishers v Nation Enterprises which held that The Nation's unauthorized publication of a 400 word excerpt from an over 600 page autobiography of former President Ford did not qualify as fair use. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
For more on crush videos and the First Amendment, see my prior post, Cleaning Up the Mess After United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:31 pm
Burrows for this post. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 7:40 pm
Also, earlier this year in a 9th Circuit decision, Palouse Prairie Foundation v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Auxer v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 10:22 am
The Supreme Court laid it out in a capital case, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:29 pm
CASE BRIEFNapolean Sarony, a photographer, sued Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co., a printing company, for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act of 1874 (18 Stat. 78) when it attempted to sell 85,000 unauthorized copies of Sarony's Oscar Wilde No. 18 photograph.The 1790 Copyright Act explicitly protected any "map, [nautical] chart or book. [read post]
