Search for: "Bush v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December in In Re United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
John Roberts is sworn in as the 17th Chief Justice of the United States under President George W. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:13 am
Bush, et al., Cheryl D. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:56 am
Bush, George W. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:21 am
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 5:00 am
United States (06-571) and at 11 a.m. in Stoneridge v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
The Obama administration’s forbearance on asserting the state secrets privilege in Salim v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:59 am
On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear argument in Medellin v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
In Moore v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:42 am
Fadel of UofT at Foreign Policy, At issue is the constitutionality of the United States government’s interpretation of a 1996 law criminalizing, with a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison, the provision of “material support” to foreign terrorist organizations. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 9:53 pm
When the previous Chief Justice talked about Bush v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
United States (06-571) and Stoneridge v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:34 am
In a Complaint filed late yesterday in the Alaska District Court, United States Senate Candidate Joe Miller is seeking to exclude write-in ballots for incumbent Senator Lisa Murkowski unless her name is spelled correctly. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 12:50 pm
Jaguars -- the animal, not the vehicle -- used to be in the United States, but we killed them all. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm
What, if anything, do developments in the military commission case of United States v. al-Nashiri portend for Al-Nashiri v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:40 pm
”) After further consultation with the Executive branch, Congress then re-passed the NDAA with the FSIA provision, but included a new provision that allowed the President to waive provisions of the FSIA amendments with respect to Iraq provided the President determined that (A) the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States; (B) the waiver will promote the reconstruction of, the consolidation of democracy in, and the relations of the United… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 9:38 am
And it has happened more than once — and as recently as Bush v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:14 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:05 am
The constitutionality of the Act was challenged in ACLU v. [read post]
