Search for: "C&C HOLDINGS LLC"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2015, 3:50 am
Chrome Hearts LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 6:43 am
ACQIS LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
The only other formal requirement under LLC Law §407(c) is that the non-consenting members afterward be given "prompt notice" of the action taken without a meeting. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm
Windy City Innovations, LLC to make clear that joinder issues were outside of the appeal bar. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:32 am
This article was co-authored by Franklin C. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:32 am
This article was co-authored by Franklin C. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
Manti Holdings, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
C. 271(f)(2). [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
§ 1052(c) provides, in pertinent part, that the PTO must deny federal registration to a trademark if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular individual except by his written consent…. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:38 am
BB&HC, LLC, No. 16 C 4934, Slip Op. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm
C. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:22 am
A recent decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich, in Slayton v Highline Stages, LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 24333 [Sup Ct, NY County Oct. 30, 2014], holds that the “unambiguous language” of § 407(a) trumps § 1002(c). [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 12:03 pm
C. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:37 am
C. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:47 am
In 2018, two members of a realty holding LLC sought judicial dissolution based on the death of one of the other members. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC Patent Litigation, No. 11 C 9308 (N.D. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:42 am
" Richard C. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:00 am
Valer C. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:49 am
The two defendant members, holding a majority interest in the LLC, accused the plaintiff member of misappropriating rents. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 2:11 am
First, it dismissed Farro’s claim that the merger effectuated by written consent of the majority members in lieu of a meeting on 20-days notice to all members, was invalid under LLC Law § 1002 (c). [read post]
