Search for: "C/O Rodriguez, -"
Results 161 - 180
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2009, 8:00 am
BERS: mayoral appointees Schools Chancellor Joel Klein, Alan Aviles, Philip Berry, David Chang, Tino Hernandez, Edison O. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
McLaughlin observed that "[o]ne of the remarkable characteristics of lynx is their extremely high dependence on snowshoe hare, which constitutes the vast majority of the lynx diet. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 7:00 pm
Look what changes the City of New York was able to secure from a bunch of publicly traded companies: THOMPSON REPORTS ON PENSION FUNDS' 2008 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS New York City Comptroller William C. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:38 pm
La doctrina mayoritaria ha interpretado ampliamente el artÃÂculo 335 del Código Civil, incluyendo dentro de la categorÃÂa de bienes muebles a los bienes incorporales, como la propiedad intelectual. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 9:50 pm
O'Neil and Brian Waterman; and from the Office of the Inspector General, Office of Investigations, Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Special Agent in Charge Bernardo Rodriguez; Special Agents Manuel Hernandez, Julie Rivera and Ariel Rodriguez. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:01 am
Add in a career-best performance by Wandy Rodriguez (13 RSAA/3.54 ERA) and excellent performances by pick-ups Randy Wolf ( ) and LaTroy Hawkins ( ) over the final 40% of the season, as well as a consistently solid bullpen performance throughout the season, and the Stros staff improved dramatically over the 2007 staff's abysmal performance (-79 RSAA) and provided the foundation of the Stros' better-than-expected record this season. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:20 pm
C-Rod v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:37 am
§ 924(c) and (o) violated the 20 year statutory maximum. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
M-3
C., Robert . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:34 am
Rodriguez and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
/Aff. (686-687) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Rodriguez ... [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
/Aff. (686-687) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Rodriguez ... [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:46 am
/Aff. (686-687) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Rodriguez ... [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Orangeburg County School District No. 2, 518 S.E.2d 259, 261 n.7 (S.C. 1999) ("[b]y placing one's mental or physical condition in issue, a party has done an act which is so incompatible with an invocation of the physician-patient privilege that the privilege is deemed waived"); Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 1:03 am
Behm Jr., Justin C. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 2:41 pm
O'Neall said Wednesday he agreed only to the conviction being set aside, not the records destroyed. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
La explicación está en nuestro tÃtulo: el fallo debe leerse con lógica de laudo.Algunos (aprobatoriamente o en tono crÃtico) sostienen que los jueces a veces hacen eso, especialmente si deben "reunificarse" luego de zigzagueos jurisprudenciales como los que exhibió la Corte en la saga que empezó en el ya olvidado "Kiper" de 2001 (tan olvidado que me costó bastante… [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
16 Feb 2006, 8:33 pm
La idea subyacente era la de resolver la cuestión con las reglas de solidaridad del Código Civil, y en particular con su art. 705.ARTICULO 705.- El acreedor, o cada acreedor, o los acreedores juntos pueden exigir el pago de la deuda por entero contra todos los deudores solidarios juntamente, o contra cualquiera de ellos.Pueden exigir la parte que a un solo deudor corresponda. [read post]
17 Oct 2005, 4:41 pm
; ¿cómo hacemos para hacer valer el reglamento del colegio si cada decisión que tomamos es potencialmente judiciable? [read post]