Search for: "C FLOWERS"
Results 161 - 180
of 556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2022, 5:14 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:43 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the… [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland),… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland),… [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland),… [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland),… [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:56 am
Therefore, the pottery of the plaintiff appeared like:The defendant is selling the pottery domestically by using the following marks (hereinafter "Defendant Marks"): c) Judgement under the above legal principlesIn consideration of various kinds of situation, Plaintiff Marks were not mere designs of pottery, and it is determined that they were used as trade marks. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 5:38 am
It would be better if they did so before understaffing flowers into a full-blown public safety crisis at remote, rural units that gets people killed. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:20 am
This Kat likes the flowers (and maybe even the bumblebees)If you didn't get the chance to keep up with The IPKat last week, never fear: this week's roundup is here.CopyrightThe big copyright news last week came in the form of Advocate General Øe's Opinion in Joined Cases C-682/18 and C-683/18, advising the CJEU to rule that platforms are not liable for the making available of infringing user-uploaded content under EU law prior to the… [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:24 pm
Flowers, the Court clarified that people are eligible for relief under the First Step Act even if their Guidelines remain unchanged. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:05 am
" with quotes going back to 1959:1959 C. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 11:49 pm
(Ir)relevance of the circumstance that the EUTM represents an artworkFirst of all, the Board considered the application of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b)-(c) EUTMR.It noted that each IP right has its own subsistence requirements (see also Gömböc; IPKat here, here, and here): the fact that a sign represents an artwork that can be or could have been protected by copyright (e.g., a public domain work) does not preclude at the outset that it could be… [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
Flowers, 2007 Minn. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
Pumpkin by Flowers by Walter As summer gives way to autumn and the golden leaves tumble, the prettiest flowers are those that come the florists -- which brings the IPKat on to today's decision in Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, a reference to the Court of the European Union (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:54 pm
The principal flaws in the proposed clause are in paragraphs (c) and (e). [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 3:40 pm
Glatt for her wedding flowers? [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 1:59 pm
So, leaves, flowers and fruit falling onto your neighbor's property is NOT common law trespass. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 1:59 pm
So, leaves, flowers and fruit falling onto your neighbor's property is NOT common law trespass. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 3:50 am
Richard C. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
