Search for: "C v. B"
Results 161 - 180
of 22,652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
If ever there was a case in which desuetude could be a successful defense to a federal criminal prosecution, I have to think that this would be it. b. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:49 pm
See Breona C. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:49 am
An injunction that requires A to clean up a nuisance afflicting neighbor B might also have good benefits for neighbor C. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Two federal district courts recently upheld decisions by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (FRBKC) and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF) to deny master account applications from Custodia Bank (Custodia) and PayServices Bank (PayServices). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
§ 201(c) (gratuities for federal officials) and then replace it with different language, instead of copying the text from Section 201(b) (bribery of federal officials)? [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:49 pm
See Haynes v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:56 pm
Secada Medical LLC d/b/a Ventris Medical, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
And in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
” G.S. 7B-2604(c). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:58 am
Por ello, el principio básico, que repite machaconamente las sentencias que sobre la materia se dictan, es que la ejecución de sentencias forma parte del derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva consagrado en el art. 24 CE . [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The case – SEC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:02 pm
In the case of A v A [2004] EWHC 142 (Fam)[Microsoft Word – 2004-EWHC-142 (thecustodyminefield.com)], the Judge included a schedule / footnote to his judgment setting out scenarios where (a) parent A can act unilaterally, (b) where parent A has a duty to consult parent B but does not need parent B’s consent, and (c) where both parent A and B must consent. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
RBKC is a person who manages premises and is a controller of let premises, namely, in this case, Flat 7. ii) FG relies on section 32(3)(b) of the Equality Act 2010 to exclude the letting of Flat 7 from Part 4 of the Equality Act 2010, but this is wrong. [read post]
Patent Term Adjustment and Obviousness-Type Double Patenting: Cellect’s Bid for Supreme Court Review
14 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
In Novartis AG v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
” Perkins v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am
Circuit’s long-awaited decision is State of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm
In R. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
As a reminder for those familiar, the acts that trigger an excise tax include: (i) taxes on the private foundation’s net investment income,[15] (ii) prohibitions on self-dealing transactions,[16] (iii) failure to make the required five percent (5%) qualifying distributions to charities,[17] (iv) prohibition on excess business holdings,[18] (v) prohibition on holding jeopardizing investments,[19] and (vi) taxable expenditures,[20] none of which apply to a 501(c)(4).[21] … [read post]
