Search for: "C v. B" Results 161 - 180 of 22,657
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In considering the criteria, Jackman J noted the Court must take into account the ‘transparency’ of the term, per s 12BG(2)(b), in addition to the contract as a whole, per s 12BG(2)(c), in interpreting unfairness. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am by Vladyslav Lanovoy
Al Haq argued that Criterion 1(b) does not require a predictive assessment and sets a “lower” standard than Criterion 2(c). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
If ever there was a case in which desuetude could be a successful defense to a federal criminal prosecution, I have to think that this would be it. b. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:49 am by Samuel Bray
An injunction that requires A to clean up a nuisance afflicting neighbor B might also have good benefits for neighbor C. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Two federal district courts recently upheld decisions by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (FRBKC) and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF) to deny master account applications from Custodia Bank (Custodia) and PayServices Bank (PayServices). [read post]
§ 201(c) (gratuities for federal officials) and then replace it with different language, instead of copying the text from Section 201(b) (bribery of federal officials)? [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:58 am by JR Chaves
Por ello, el principio básico, que repite machaconamente las sentencias que sobre la materia se dictan, es que la ejecución de sentencias forma parte del derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva consagrado en el  art. 24 CE . [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:02 pm by Laura
In the case of A v A [2004] EWHC 142 (Fam)[Microsoft Word – 2004-EWHC-142 (thecustodyminefield.com)], the Judge included a schedule / footnote to his judgment setting out scenarios where (a) parent A can act unilaterally, (b) where parent A has a duty to consult parent B but does not need parent B’s consent, and (c) where both parent A and B must consent. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm by Giles Peaker
RBKC is a person who manages premises and is a controller of let premises, namely, in this case, Flat 7. ii) FG relies on section 32(3)(b) of the Equality Act 2010 to exclude the letting of Flat 7 from Part 4 of the Equality Act 2010, but this is wrong. [read post]