Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 161 - 180 of 3,971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the Town terminating the plaintiff [Employee] based on the findings and recommendation of a disciplinary hearing officer, Supreme Court [a] denied the Town's motion to dismiss the Employee petition; [b] granted Employee's petition to the extent of annulling the penalty imposed; and [c] remitting the matter to the Town for the imposition of a less severe penalty. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the Town terminating the plaintiff [Employee] based on the findings and recommendation of a disciplinary hearing officer, Supreme Court [a] denied the Town's motion to dismiss the Employee petition; [b] granted Employee's petition to the extent of annulling the penalty imposed; and [c] remitting the matter to the Town for the imposition of a less severe penalty. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm by Matthew Ackerman
., 440 U.S. 202, 203 (1979) (“[C]ompensation to cover a landowner’s litigation costs is a matter of legislative grace rather than constitutional command. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm by Larry
Cases brought under the Enforce and Protect Act have their own standard of review in 19 USC 1517(g). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm by Russell Knight
If you do not agree on any or all custody matters in your Illinois divorce, expect a Guardian Ad Litem or a Child Representative to be appointed in your case. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
It remitted the matter to the Family Court for a new hearing and determination. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 11:03 am by Eleonora Rosati
In particular, the court found the degree of visual and phonetic similarity to be low (due to the element ‘G’ in the G-maxx mark and a perceived different pronunciation) and took into account a market survey where 52% of the participants indicated not to be confused by the different marks.Concluding in the sense of no infringement, the court dismissed the appeal in its entirety.CommentReflecting on this case, this Katfriend disagrees with several principal findings of… [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Matter of Blatt 2023 NY Slip Op 04120 Decided on August 2, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Per Curiam is both a common and unusual attorney story. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:42 am by Elie Maalouf
Shortly before the inspection was to take place, we successfully resolved this matter. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Genesis: G-d said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
Chronic failure of contractor personnel to comply with agreed-to dates for furnishing data g. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm
The nomenklatura that now constitute the apparatus of many states will welcome its provisions for the leverage it may provide for the clarification, protection, and aspirations with respect to the only thing that matters--the protection and augmentation of their own little piece of the public regulatory pie. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 8:02 am
 One of the most forgettable parts of the development of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights were its provisions on balancing prevent-mitigation-and remedy strategies when no matter what choice is made, there will be breaches of human rights. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
Whether section 16 of the Kenyan Work Injury Benefits Act 2016 (“WIBA”) ousts the jurisdiction of courts in claims arising from an occupational accident or disease causing disablement or death in the course of work; 3 c. [read post]