Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. COLORADO" Results 161 - 180 of 502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” The TDPSA’s definition of “personal data” (similar to those of the privacy laws in Virginia, California, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah) excludes “deidentified data or publicly available information. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 3:46 am by Kevin Kaufman
 (including neighboring California, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico). [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 7:54 am by Eric
* Another ill-conceived California law: large companies have to disclose on their websites their efforts to reduce slavery and human trafficking in their supply chains. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:44 am by Sam Favate
The resolution before the council cites Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black’s 1938 dissenting opinion in Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:54 am by kylew
Holodniy worked at a private California biotechnology company called Cetus, which was later bought by Roche, to develop a blood testing system. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
  But, recognizing the primacy of federal law in this field, the Illinois statute itself protects companies from liability if their actions are authorized by federal law.Id. at 941. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:28 am by Roy Ginsburg
  Regards, Roy] Quirky Question # 178: We are a large company with operations in several states. [read post]