Search for: "CALIFORNIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT V US"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 7:54 am
Despite the human health and ecological impacts of oil and gas development, the County has sought to streamline its oil and gas permitting under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:39 am
See Fields v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
County v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
He refused the representative claimant permission to serve the claim on Google in California. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 11:07 am
Kuligoski v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm
- Gideon Kanner's takedown of the recent California Court of Appeal decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
“Aspirations”: The United States and Indigenous Peoples’ human rights. [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
European Court of Human RightsGawlik v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:35 am
Yet for us humans, a new year holds so much promise. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:49 pm
Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development ("CREED") v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
While the pandemic is largely behind us, questions remain. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:30 pm
Patent No. 6,331,415, covers a technology that uses cell cultures to manufacture human antibodies. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
The decision in Trkulja v Google Inc (No 5) appeared to suggest that the Australian common law had developed in a different direction but McCallum J was not persuaded and supported the English approach. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Waters v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm
Examples include: Evidence in the Doe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:29 am
The Federal Circuit in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:04 am
The arrangement was perfectly legal in California. [read post]
