Search for: "CIR, Law Offices, LLP" Results 161 - 180 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
Hormel, Hormel Law Office, LLC, Spokane, WA)   United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:09 am
The AmeriKat in standard essential formAt the last day of June, the First Joint Seminar on SEP/FRAND Mediation and Arbitration co-organised by Queen Mary University of London’s School of International Arbitration (SIA) and the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center was hosted at the London offices of Allen & Overy LLP. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Commercial Speech:  The Definition MattersModerators:  Chris Beall, Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz LLP and Bruce Johnson, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Steven G. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Ray Dowd
Norton Simon Museum of Art, 592 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit invalidated a California law that extended the State statute of limitations for claims seeking recovery of Holocaust-era artwork. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Ray Dowd
Norton Simon Museum of Art, 592 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit invalidated a California law that extended the State statute of limitations for claims seeking recovery of Holocaust-era artwork. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Ray Dowd
Norton Simon Museum of Art, 592 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit invalidated a California law that extended the State statute of limitations for claims seeking recovery of Holocaust-era artwork. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
Dietze, Ph.D., is Of Counsel in the Washington, DC office and Mini Kapoor, Ph.D., is an associate in the Houston, Texas office of the law firm of Haynes and Boone, LLP. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Court decided as a matter of law there was no red flag knowledge, turning statute into pure notice and takedown which was specifically rejected. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In analyzing whether the non-assignment clause was enforceable under Colorado or California law, the court noted that under Colorado law the non-assignment clause was enforceable whether the assignment took place before or after the incurrence of a loss. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Further, state law could allow a corporation to indemnify a director or officer. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  We therefore, conclude this loss falls within the coverage of the Bond, in accordance with Minnesota law. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cochran Firm Los Angeles LLP, --- Fed.Appx. ---, 2016 WL 770129, No. 15–55816 (9th Cir. [read post]