Search for: "CIR Law Offices"
Results 161 - 180
of 7,874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm
Barker v Riverside County Office of Educ, ___F.3d____(9th Cir. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:06 am
Cir. 1988); and to the standards that govern in other areas of law. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:44 am
Would the officers need a search warrant to do that? [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 3:55 pm
Director, Office of Workers' Compenstion Programs (10th Cir., December 20, 2017) (affirming award to petitioner of black lung benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:29 pm
Yesterday's 10 Cir. decision (United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:47 pm
P. 4(c)(3)(A), not state law, controlled as to the arrest, and the officer did not have to have the arrest warrant in hand or nearby. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:43 am
His law firm profile lists him as having offices in both Washington, D.C., and San Francisco, and he has worked on cases in California and at the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
LEXIS 6086 (3d Cir. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 7:40 am
LEXIS 6945 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:39 pm
Begin, 753 F.3d 1, 9 (1st Cir. 2014) (holding that there can be a First Amendment right to film a police officer making a traffic stop), and Smith v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
Back in July, I posted that the 3rd Circuit held TSA screeners were not law enforcement officers for purposes of the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 5:48 am
LEXIS 15375 (8th Cir. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:26 pm
In her private search prior to contacting law enforcement, Mrs. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:57 am
LEXIS 3341 (5th Cir. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 5:55 am
Appx. 21 (2d Cir. 2014). [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 7:08 am
LEXIS 13591 (3d Cir. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:46 am
In a recent post, I mentioned the low level of respect accorded due process hearing officers in the world of special education law. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:12 pm
Law Office of Joseph Onwuteaka, P.C. (5th Cir. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 9:05 pm
Patent and Trademark Office) should apply the written description requirement in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
Here's what Section 3 of Article XX says:"Members of the Legislature, and all public officers and employees, executive, legislative, and judicial, except such inferior officers and employees as may be by law exempted, shall, before they enter upon the duties of their respective offices, take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation . . . [read post]
