Search for: "COFFER v. STATE"
Results 161 - 180
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 5:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 10:56 am
Tomislav V. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:49 pm
The practice was found to be unconstitutional under the 4th Amendment in Shain v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Lee Holding Co., 471 F.3d 6, 11 (1st Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:19 am
, but I might have went with this bon mot:For each ecstatic instantWe must an anguish payIn keen and quivering ratioTo the ectasty.For each beloved hourSharp pittances of years,Bitter contested farthingsAnd coffers heaped with tears.I don't know, maybe the Judge's reference was more on-point.Then we have Judge Huck's reference to that dreaded hip Eurobeast, international "law":In refusing to recognize the judgment, the Court applied the “international concept… [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:58 am
Recall Utah's failed attempt to line its coffers by taxing email (which turned into a big money-loser), and don't forget its repeated attempts to regulate Internet content that have spawned years of costly litigation (see, e.g., Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:34 am
The Court of Appeals' 5-1 decision in Walton v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:29 pm
They already have reasonable Freedom of Speech protections (First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:47 am
Compare that to the $0.00 that Pennsylvania taxpayers have paid so far for the prosecution of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:42 pm
Next week: The Judges' dilemma - they have to meet the mandate of Gideon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
After stating the amounts or percentages allowable on sums distributed by the trustee that are less than one million dollars, §326 says that the court can award the trustee “reasonable compensation not to exceed 3 percent of such moneys in excess of $1,000,000, upon all monies disbursed or turned over in the case to parties in interest, excluding the debtor [i.e., excluding Madoff]. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
The Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 6:40 pm
The Court justified the remand, based on a recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:41 am
Stanford student Jacob Heller summarizes Monday's argument in Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:31 am
The question is: will this legislation make our Court System and Clerk more efficient with better use of our limited economic resources or is it a "wolf in sheep's clothing" which, under the pretense of economy and helping to relieve the Court's funding crisis, will provide an avenue for the State to funnel more local money into its coffers? [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:26 am
The filing paints a picture of Heller's shrinking capital coffers as a steady stream of partners left in 2008. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:48 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
Barnaba and the problems with the discovery process have delayed prosecution of United States v. [read post]
