Search for: "COX v. COX" Results 161 - 180 of 1,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Sam Ozer-Staton – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, Spotify Carroll v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Sam Ozer-Staton – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, Spotify Carroll v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Sam Ozer-Staton – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, Spotify Carroll v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Sam Ozer-Staton – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, Spotify Carroll v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:18 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, SpotifyNow & Then, “Entangling Alliances,” 6/1/21NY Penal Law §460.20 - Enterprise corruptionEric Swalwell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:18 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, SpotifyNow & Then, “Entangling Alliances,” 6/1/21NY Penal Law §460.20 - Enterprise corruptionEric Swalwell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:18 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, SpotifyNow & Then, “Entangling Alliances,” 6/1/21NY Penal Law §460.20 - Enterprise corruptionEric Swalwell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:18 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, SpotifyNow & Then, “Entangling Alliances,” 6/1/21NY Penal Law §460.20 - Enterprise corruptionEric Swalwell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
Christopher Cox in a letter dated Aug. 13, 1999, that the Defense Department would comply (though he also cautioned that such a requirement might be inconsistent with existing law regarding civil liberties protections for U.S. persons). [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 9:30 am by Jason Rantanen
  In this guest post he provides his observations of the damages testimony in VLSI Technologies v. [read post]