Search for: "Cahill v State"
Results 161 - 180
of 206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 12:18 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:05 pm
Cahill, though one particular restriction -- the 30-day anti-solicitation rule -- was upheld. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
S 59 Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to ways and meansA160
Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation which are necessary to implement the state fiscal plan for the 2009-2010 state fiscal year Same as Uni. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
S 58 BLURB : Budgbi HMH Art. vii Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to ways and meansA160
Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation which are necessary to implement the state fiscal plan for the 2009-2010 state fiscal year Same as Uni. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:43 pm
Roosevelt UFSD; grants Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 9 01/28/2008 01/28/2008 Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.9 10 S6773 ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 10 01/28/2008 provided that the applicable effective date for Parts A through B shall be as specifically set forth… [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 2:41 pm
Cahill v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
., v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Cahill © 2008 ALM Properties Inc. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 10:19 pm
The Journal News, 08-03892, a case of first impression in New York.He noted that Greenbaum v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 3:34 pm
The Journal News, 08-03892, a case of first impression in New York.He noted that Greenbaum v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Roosevelt UFSD; grants
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date9
01/28/2008
01/28/2008Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.910
S6773
ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits
Chapter
Signed… [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:37 am
Circuit's decision in Rambus Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 1:44 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:32 am
A9806B
Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation necessary to implement the public protection and general government budget for the 2008-2009 state fiscal plan No Same as Last Act: 03/09/08 amend and recommit to ways and means03/09/08 print number 9806bA9808B
Budget -- Enacts major components of legislation necessary to implement the health and mental hygiene budget for the 2008-2009 fiscal year No Same as Last Act: 03/09/08 amend… [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:05 pm
Cahill: "Prof. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:33 am
Round one has been won by lawyer James Alexander in New York in Alexander v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 9:05 pm
The court adopted the approach in Doe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:31 am
Cahill many of New York's contentious new ethics rules. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:48 pm
Test adds an additional “balancing of the competing interests” element to the Cahill test Mobilisa, Inc. v. [read post]
