Search for: "California v. Lord" Results 161 - 180 of 304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but a few resolved cases: Richard Jones v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Levy & McRae Solicitors, on behalf of Christopher and Mary Gorman v The Sun, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Mr Dean Torkington v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Dr Helen Hammond v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Basim Shamsuddin v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 19/03/2013; Noveprim Group… [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
  Nonetheless, because a case from the California Supreme Court forty years ago held the contrary, the court elects to follow that precedent and let the appeal go forward.Justice Kennard makes a pretty good argument for going the other way, albeit solely prospectively. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
The cross-party amendments to the Defamation Bill in the House of Lords have drawn the ire of Lord Lester and libel reform campaigners. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
California satisfies the requirement for a defendant to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require reappointment of counsel to file a motion for new trial. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
At the end of my post on Apple's Black Friday motion to bring infringement claims against six more Samsung products in California I promised that I would report on the two Samsung v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Charles Rowland
The Lord said, “I will not destroy it for the ten’s sake. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
  Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am by Rosalind English
(Initiatives like this one have failed in California, Maine, and Hawaii.) [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm by Matthew David Brozik
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
On 20 July 2012 there will be an application in the case of Lord Ashcroft v Foley. [read post]