Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 12,582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:35 pm
NCIS, No. 3:10-cv-01879-WQH-MDD, in the United States District Court for the Sourthern District of California. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:48 am
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:41 pm
Apte v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:21 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Worley have posted Evidence that the President is an "Officer of the United States" for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 8:40 am
The settlement says: subdivisions (a)(3), (a)(4)(A), and (a)(5) of California Business and Professions Code section 22677 violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution facially and as applied to Plaintiff The state also must pay X $345,576 to cover its challenge costs. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 10:00 am
California and American Speech Law at the Wilson Center, 6th Floor Moynihan Board Room, Monday, November 9, 2015, 4:00-5:30pm:The United States has the world's most permissive speech laws. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
He is a United Kingdom citizen and non- immigrant alien, living in the United States pursuant to a valid E-2 Visa, who at all relevant times has been residing in Sonoma, California. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:49 pm
California. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
A man was arrested for wearing a jacket with a political message on it while in the history exhibit at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:16 pm
” The lawsuit was filed in 2008, prior to the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:37 pm
Request under California Rules of Court rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
United States, 530 U. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:16 am
Earlier this week, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the lawsuit of United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:14 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 3:01 pm
And, in the third paragraph of your latest appeal, Judge Beezer describes your status for the reader with the following language:"Gadda has now been disbarred by the State of California, the BIA, the United States District Court for Northern District of California and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:00 am
Aug. 22, 2016), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted the motion, but allowed the municipalities to amend their complaints as to their nuisance causes of action. [read post]
