Search for: "California v. Watson"
Results 161 - 180
of 222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2010, 5:02 pm
Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm
The Virginia Supreme Court in William Joseph Burns v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:59 am
(patent infringement) 12/2: Konarka Technologies, DuPont Displays Inc. and The Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
Watson (08-6261), and Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
In the case of People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:05 am
Have the inventor make a secret side deal (Patent Baristas) US: Governors send letter to Congressional leaders in support of 12-year data exclusivity period (Patent Docs) US Congress urged to act on biosimilars (GenericsWeb) US: Hal Wegner wakes up ACI Biotech Patents Forum in Boston – KSR and biotech claims (BioTechnology Patent Law) Products Amrix (Cyclobenzaprine) – US: Eurand files patent infringement suit in C D California against Anchen… [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:42 pm
Watson. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:49 pm
Based on Griffiths v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
" The new law reverses a recent California Supreme Court decisions (Van Horn v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:34 am
Less than a year later, the California Supreme Court struck down the state's death penalty in People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
BOX 39 CABOOL MO-Missouri 38 Cal's Thriftway 408 West Buchanan California MO-Missouri 39 WOODS SUPER MARKET 8845 NORTH STATE HIGHWAY 5 CAMDENTON MO-Missouri 40 Country Mart 1303 N. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
17 May 2009, 8:13 pm
Watson, (1956) 46 Cal. 2d 818, 836, [299 P.2d 243]. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 11:27 am
Watson, (Supreme Court of California, December 18, 2008) 197 P.3d 164, 45 Cal.4th 322, 197 P.3d 164, 86 Cal.Rptr. 3d 350, 08 Cal. [read post]
FTC and California AG Join in Challenging Reverse Payment Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry
6 Mar 2009, 7:03 am
Trade Comm'n et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:34 pm
Watson (1976) 359 A.2d 548, 552; Sevigny v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(C.D.Cal. 2008) 2008 WL 4690536 Watson-Smith v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 6:48 am
Watson, 80 Fed. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 8:17 am
On December 19th, we wrote an article about a poorly decided California Supreme Court decision, Van Horn v. [read post]
