Search for: "Call v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 60,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2011, 6:11 am by admin
Another example is the famous “Motion to Reconsider” which is frequently used in state courts when you think the Judge make a mistake and hope that he will fix it once you call it to his attention. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:20 am by Dan Filler
This from the folks at the University of Iowa: CALL FOR PAPERS:  For a proposed symposium  to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 3:56 pm by Norm Pattis
 My hope was to poke my head in on the trial of State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 7:10 pm
Joe Seiner sends along this call for papers from Nancy Welsh at Penn State Law: On Friday, March 26, 2010, the Penn State Law Review will hold a symposium addressing the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:08 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The United States today filed this notice of withdrawal of its previous motion to file under seal in Martin v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:11 pm by Bryan P. Sears
The leader of the Maryland Senate says the leave of absence taken by Baltimore Mayor Catherine Pugh comes at a bad time for the city, but he stopped short of calling for the former state senator to step down. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:58 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law United States Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, writing a concurring opinion from the denial of certiorari in McKee v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am by EMMY GIBBS, ATLEU
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am by Christopher J. Walker
John’s University Law Review is pleased to announce a Call for Papers for our upcoming symposium on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. [read post]