Search for: "Callahan V Cir*"
Results 161 - 180
of 528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2015, 10:29 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 1:28 pm
Washington v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:23 pm
Dickens v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 6:14 pm
The two California cases are Broughton v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Judges McKeown and Murguia -- two left-leaning women on the panel -- join a concurrence that says that the majority goes to far, and that in their view, prior low salary is okay to consider if it's combined with other factors that justify the contemporary salary differential.Judges Callahan and Tallman, not surprisingly, are even less sympathetic to the majority opinion, and agree that the current case was improperly resolved (since the only basis for the pay… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:33 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:13 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
Ayala v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 8:06 pm
Several days ago, I posted about a Ninth Circuit decision, Barnes v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 4:26 am
Adding to the mess, there is the problem of Pearson v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 11:19 am
Paramo, No. 14-56946 (8-30-16)(Callahan w/Clifton and Ikuta). [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:01 pm
In an opinion by Judge Callahan, no less.Which seems right.So there you have it. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:42 am
Especially in combination.Here are my brief comments about the case when the initial opinion (by Judge Berzon, with a dissent by Judge Callahan) came out a couple of years ago. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
Until I read this one, anyway.Rather than have me describe what transpired, let me just share Judge Silverman's dissent to Judge Callahan's opinion, which cogently (and concisely) explains what's going on:"Because I believe the City of Riverside waived its argument that 28 C.F.R. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Again, at least in this context.Judge Callahan dissents. [read post]
