Search for: "Callahan v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2011, 11:33 am
US Attorney Richard Callahan responded on March 16 by initiating a lawsuit against the mummy mask.In a complaint titled United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
United States (9th Cir. 1984). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:12 pm
Moore and Vernonia School District 47J v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm
Disparity in Federal Sentencing: Boston Globe staff writer Jonathan Saltzman has this article on a recent study of the widened disparity in federal sentences in light of the case United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 10:27 pm
Summer, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), decided by the United States Supreme Court the court addressed the issue of when an individual can be seized prior to executing a search warrant. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
L.J. 151, 153–58 (1994) [hereinafter Callahan & Dworkin, Media Whistleblowers]. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 7:54 am
In Pellegrino v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 12:13 pm
From: Judges Gould, Bybee, Callahan & Bea On September 20, 2010, Circuit Judge Gould joined by Circuit Judges Bybee, Callahan, and Bea issued an order dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:03 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:04 am
Judge Callahan notes: The concurrence is not joined by a majority of the en banc panel and accordingly the suggested guidelines are not Ninth Circuit law. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 11:03 am
Today from the Ninth Circuit, we see an unusual split between Judges Kleinfeld and Callahan in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm
The five dissenting judges argued that this “evidentiary privilege” — traced to the Supreme Court’s 1953 decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
Callahan, and Barbara M. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:17 pm
Callahan, Carlos T. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:38 am
Rutti v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:19 pm
Callahan and United States v. [read post]
