Search for: "Cancel v. City of Providence" Results 161 - 180 of 492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c) provides that "a resignation may not be withdrawn, cancelled or amended after it is delivered to the appointing authority without the consent of the appointing authority," nevertheless sustained the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c) provides that "a resignation may not be withdrawn, cancelled or amended after it is delivered to the appointing authority without the consent of the appointing authority," nevertheless sustained the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c) provides that "a resignation may not be withdrawn, cancelled or amended after it is delivered to the appointing authority without the consent of the appointing authority," nevertheless sustained the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c) provides that "a resignation may not be withdrawn, cancelled or amended after it is delivered to the appointing authority without the consent of the appointing authority," nevertheless sustained the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c) provides that "a resignation may not be withdrawn, cancelled or amended after it is delivered to the appointing authority without the consent of the appointing authority," nevertheless sustained the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c) provides that "a resignation may not be withdrawn, cancelled or amended after it is delivered to the appointing authority without the consent of the appointing authority," nevertheless sustained the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 pm by Alyson Carney
The comradery of the competition provided for a stimulating day. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The burden of serving a proper "notice to appear" at an administrative hearing is the responsibility of the charging partyPereira v Sessions, USSC, Docket 17-459The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act provides that a nonpermanent resident who is subject to removal may be eligible for cancellation of removal if he or she has “been physically present" in the U.S. for a continuous period of not less than 10 years.* Continuous… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:27 am by malik11397
First National Bank of Lake City, , 81 So. 2d 486, (Fla., 1955) Tamiami Abstract and Title Company v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 1:50 am
Lamar's testimony provided valid business reasons for the lease terms. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:10 pm by Donald Dinnie
In Namasthethu Electrical (Pty) Ltd v City of Cape Town and another a successful tenderer had fraudulently denied that the company and one of its directors had been convicted of fraud. [read post]