Search for: "Caps v. Board Members"
Results 161 - 180
of 349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Disney, Davy Crockett and the coonskin cap I UPC - update from UK on statutory instruments I The ILO rules reinstatement of Board of Appeal member, but EPO resists I INTA calling: The 2018 Ladas Memorial Award competition for paper on a trademark subject I R 0003/15: surprising interpretation of feature violates right to be heard I Germany: Bundespatentgericht annuls Nespresso capsule shape mark I Wind in the sails for atypical trade marks in the EU - graphical… [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:10 pm
Brussels court in FN Herstal v Heckler & Koch wrestles with combination invention v mere aggregation of features. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
Disney, Davy Crockett and the coonskin cap I UPC - update from UK on statutory instruments I The ILO rules reinstatement of Board of Appeal member, but EPO resists I INTA calling: The 2018 Ladas Memorial Award competition for paper on a trademark subject I R 0003/15: surprising interpretation of feature violates right to be heard I Germany: Bundespatentgericht annuls Nespresso capsule shape mark I Wind in the sails for atypical trade marks in the EU - graphical… [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
Disney, Davy Crockett and the coonskin cap“With less than 10 shopping days to Christmas, it is worth taking a Kat’s eye retrospective of what may have been the first big-time modern IP merchandising campaign. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
SEC RIAs to pooled investment vehicles may avoid both the quarterly statement and surprise examination requirements by having audited financial statements prepared for each pooled investment vehicle in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles by an independent public accountant registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
SEC RIAs to pooled investment vehicles may avoid both the quarterly statement and surprise examination requirements by having audited financial statements prepared for each pooled investment vehicle in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles by an independent public accountant registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
Sauter posted the government's reply brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm
The deal undermines Turkey’s commitment as a NATO member to procure systems compatible with those of all other alliance members. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 6:45 am
The most recent cap-and-trade litigation in California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
(As I discuss in the paper, different members of the court have at times subscribed to three different justifications, though I think each of them is somewhat wanting.) [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
He considered the Court of Appeal case of Broadhurst v Tan and came to the conclusion that Part 36 overrides Part 45 such that “the limits on costs in the IPEC, both stage costs and the overall cap, do not apply to an award of costs under [former] rule 36.14(3)(b). [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
The method of calculation of this 15 percent cap, however, has not been judicially tested, and the Commonwealth does not include every revenue stream that flows through its general fund in calculating the cap. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:57 pm
California Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
Winston & Co., a member of the product investment board of GlaxoSmithKline, and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
Carrie Cordero outlined a few quick thoughts on making national security arguments in court based on Washington v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
Guido Kucsko also cautioned that OTK v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 5:53 am
Bell and Province of Alberta v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 5:53 am
Bell and Province of Alberta v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
