Search for: "Carl Gardner, Head of Legal" Results 161 - 180 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2011, 3:43 am by Charon QC
  On Wednesday evening last week, David Allen Green and Carl Gardner came over to The Staterooms for our fortnightly Without Prejudice series of podcasts. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 11:55 am by Charon QC
 Those unfamiliar with judicial sentencing practice will, I am sure, find this analysis useful:  Whole life term imposed for murderer of April Jones Carl Gardner on his Head of Legal blog covers a webinar from the Law Society: The future of press regulation: Law Society webinar The Justice of The Peace considers: BAD DRIVING AND COMPUTERS The Justice Gap: SAVE UK JUSTICE DEMO: TUESDAY, JUNE 4 –  There will be a rally outside the… [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 11:55 am by Charon QC
 Those unfamiliar with judicial sentencing practice will, I am sure, find this analysis useful:  Whole life term imposed for murderer of April Jones Carl Gardner on his Head of Legal blog covers a webinar from the Law Society: The future of press regulation: Law Society webinar The Justice of The Peace considers: BAD DRIVING AND COMPUTERS The Justice Gap: SAVE UK JUSTICE DEMO: TUESDAY, JUNE 4 –  There will be a rally outside the… [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:13 am
Stories about Lib-Dem and Tory alleged non-compliance seem to have dropped out of the headlines, but the press seems less keen to drop the bone about Labour problems, with Peter Hain having his difficulties and facing investigation by the Electoral Commission and by Parliament.Fellow blogger Carl Gardner, author of the Head of Legal blog, had this to say: “The Peter Hain case is a big test for the legal and regulatory regime on… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm by Charon QC
And let’s go for a hat trick of good reads (not that the blog posts which I refer to below are not good reads… they are… but Carl Gardner, on his Head of Legal blog, writes: Supreme Court judgment: Sugar v BBC “The Supreme Court has today given judgment in this case, about the extent to which the Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to information the BBC holds for journalistic purposes…. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:18 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
In a neat link back to the Assange case, Carl Gardner on the Head of Legal blog also addresses the actions by Craig Murray on Newsnight where he named one of the women who has alleged rape against Assange. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:27 am by Charon QC
  Carl Gardner, author of The Head of Legal blog, has covered the case in detail. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:21 am by Charon QC
  I wonder if Ken has actually read some of the leading Human Rights and Civil Liberties blogs… has he read Carl Gardner’s Head of Legal? [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
  Carl Gardner, author of The Head of Legal blog brings analysis to the fore with his question and blog post… Have lawyers really “cleared” the government to defy Strasbourg over prisoners’ votes? [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:12 pm
Carl Gardner, author of the Head of Legal blog | Geeklawyer to ensure balance and sensitivity | Dan Hull of What About Clients? [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:12 am by Melina Padron
First, Carl Gardner, of Head of Legal, wrote about the superinjunction granted in the case of ZAM v CFW & TFW. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:16 am by Charon QC
Blog: FamilyLore Twitter: @johnbolch Carl Gardner: Head of Legal blog Barrister, former government lawyer and author of the Head of Legal blog, Carl is a well known commentator on constitutional law and human rights issues – and a regular podcastee in my various series of podcasts. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Carl Gardner (@carlgardner) – His tweets are not just about media law, but he often writes about interim injunctions and the finer detail on his blog, Head of Legal. 10. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:50 pm by charonqc
  We shall see what our Courts make of this given that the superinunctions were criticised by no less than the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge. *** Carl Gardner, author of the Head of Legal blog, has an amusing story: Sion Simon, Keith Vaz and Law Officers’ advice “The DCMS minister Sion Simon has been speaking for the government in the Commons this afternoon, and is in an embarrassing situation: it appears that government lawyers have advised… [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Research & resources Gordon Ramsay, New Statesman: How the press has failed to represent the public mood over Leveson Jack of Kent: Lucy Meadows resource page paidContent: Citizen journalism at work: Unemployed British man becomes Syrian weapons expert Head of Legal, Carl Gardner, ‘Why press regulation should cover blogs‘ Liberal Conspiracy, Sunny Hundal, ‘Press regulation deal and blogs: where things stand‘ Tony Jaffa,… [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 9:01 pm by Editor
Carl Gardner provided independent legal comment and analysis from a British perspective. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
Matthew Taylor also considers the riots appeals: Riot sentencing – Appeal Judgement Bystander JP of The Magistrates’s Blog writes about  sense of relief on the riot cases appeal: Decision From The Top Carl Gardner over at Head of Legal is always a good read. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm by Charon QC
Carl Gardner, author of the Head of legal blog,  has this analysis of this week’s case célèbre (sic): Employment Tribunal ruling: O’Reilly v BBC and Adam Wagner of 1 Crown Office Row, writing on their UK Human Rights blog, stated…Still almost impossible to sue the police in negligence Desmond v The Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police 2011] EWCA Civ 3 (12 January 2011)- Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
See our recent post regarding the Supreme Court’s guidance on live text-based communications Julian Assange’s extradition hearing – Head of Legal: Carl Gardner writes the Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, is likely to be extradited back to Sweden. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:55 am by Adam Wagner
However, blogger Carl Gardner rightly points out that the Strasbourg court may indeed have overstepped its remit, and therefore despite Bratza’s justifiably robust defence, “the facts do bear out the complaint that the court has sometimes been too interventionist. [read post]