Search for: "Carnegie v. Carnegie"
Results 161 - 180
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2009, 7:45 am
I've previously summarized my own testimony and other plaintiffs' witnesses' testimony in the New Jersey voting machines trial, Gusciora v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
One of the most memorable examples was his asking, in the lead dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:05 am
ESG in the Mainstream: Sell-Side Analysts Addressing ESG Concerns Posted by David Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:30 am
The contemporary version of this argument, expressed largely in the Carnegie Report of 2007 and in recent changes to ABA accreditation standards, focuses largely on how law schools should build “experiential education” into their curricula. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:45 pm
at 29; Carnegie Mellon Univ. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am
The Apple-Samsung award needs to be adjusted here and there, but the CMU-Marvell award must simply be tossed or slashed in order to protect the innovation economy against patent unreasonableness.The cross-appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 11:40 am
The term “Captcha” was coined by a group of researchers at Carnegie Mellon University in 2000. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 7:21 am
Wednesday morning the newly constituted bench will consider Frank v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
A Sense of Privacy, Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte and Jeff Hancock, Carnegie Mellon University – H. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 6:41 am
The USPTO has identified common uses as including the ability to "[v]iew bibliographic data, status, file history, PDF file images ("IFW"), continuity, foreign priority, patent term adjustments & extensions, text & TIFF images of published applications & patents, maintenance fees, and online ordering of copies. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:13 pm
Chew and Carnegie Mellon Business Professor Robert E. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:01 am
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
‘Plausible’ that teacher provided negative job references after student rejected his sexual advances
19 Jun 2017, 7:41 am
Accordingly, the court vacated in part the decision of the court below dismissing the plaintiff’s retaliation claim (Irrera v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:55 am
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:01 am
Jim Dempsey and Michael Nelson take us through some of the possibilities: It was all about AI accelerationists v. decelerationists. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm
Makes fun of WAX [Harvard's web archiving system]Panel 3 Laura Gassaway, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law, University of North Carolina School of Law History of copyright actJonathan Band, Technology and Law Consultant Proposes Fair Use Legal Defense Fund and notes EFF and other orgs already do some of this workDenise Troll Covey, Principal Librarian for Special Projects, Carnegie Mellon University Libraries Book recommendation: Corynne McSherry, Who Owns… [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
:Interpharma Pty Ltd v Commisioner of Patents (GenericsWeb) Gemzar (Gemcitabine) - US: Eli Lilly sues Teva for patent infringement and seek declaratory judgment (The IP Factor) (Law360) Glivec (Imatinib) - India: Supreme Court appoints Dr Chakraborty as technical member on IPAB panel hearing Glivec appeal (Spicy IP) Jeevani (Arogyapacha) - India: Recent developments in the Arogypacha case (Spicy IP) Miralax (Polyethylene glycol) - US: 'Advice of scientist' defense… [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Thomas (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, March 9, 2018 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Hedge funds, In re Revlon, In re Trulia, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Unocal v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:28 am
It’s not hard to see where the justices are leaning in Frank v. [read post]
