Search for: "Carney v. Carney" Results 161 - 180 of 623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2007, 2:58 am
Had plaintiff acquired the property through foreclosure, for example, the taxes still would have had to be satisfied, the Carney debt would have been eliminated and, as such, so would any damages to plaintiff stemming from defendants' alleged malpractice (see Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v Roslyn Estates, Inc., 266 App Div 244, 248-249 [1943], affd 293 NY 680 [1944]). [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
No, says the Second Circuit (Chin, Carney and Sannes [D.J.]), because plaintiff "does not contend that these reclassifications were adverse actions," though they do constitute background evidence under Mercier v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Calabresi, Carney and Nardini) says this moots the suit. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:05 am by Howard Bashman
Breyer delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court, Justice Barrett not participating, in Carney v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But we are bound by our Court’s decision in Sutherland v. [read post]