Search for: "Certain Underwriters at Lloyd " Results 161 - 180 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2020, 5:54 pm by CJ Haddick
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, filed in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Louisiana last week, a New Orleans restaurant seeks a declaratory judgment against Lloyd’s of London and the state of Louisiana that Lloyd’s owes business interruption coverage under in  an “all-risks” business insurance policy it issued to the restaurant for COVID-related business losses. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:04 pm
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 184 (reported earlier in this blog). [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 11:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Among other things, the London market (that is, the non-Lloyd’s) market has released certain proposed exclusions that underwriters can use to try to shield themselves from cyber-related losses. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:16 am by Daniel Woods
Notably, Lloyd’s wrote that it was open to a backstop covering infrastructure losses and state-backed attacks, which the private sector, it claims, “has little to no appetite” to underwrite. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
She then filed suit against The City of Kenner (“the City”) and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London (“Lloyd’s”). [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 6:15 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  The opinion is styled, Certain Underwriters At Lloyd’s, London, Syndicate Numbers 2020, 1084, 2001, 457, 510, 2791, 2987, 3000, 1221, 5000 And Navigators Insurance Company UK v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 11:00 pm by Shawn Barnett (ZA)
(Click here for part 1) Joint Standard 1 of 2020 and the Financial Sector Regulation Act, 2017 (FSRA) prescribe wide ranging obligations for significant owners, but certain persons are exempt. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:14 am
”The reinsurers from which discovery was sought, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London and Certain London Market Insurance and Reinsurance Companies, filed amicus briefs urging the court to reject the plaintiffs' discovery request, arguing that a decision to the contrary would increase the burden on the nonparty insurers enormously by forcing them to locate and produce every reinsurance and retrocessional agreement for hundreds of… [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 11:30 pm by Penny Biram
Dural 24/7 v certain underwriters at Lloyd’s of London [2022] FCAFC 147 (Federal Court of Australia) https://jade.io/article/944277 [read post]