Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 4,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2010, 2:11 pm by Scott W Lawrence
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON No. 81279-9 (consolidated) CITY OF SEATTLE v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 5:36 pm
On Tuesday, CAAF granted review and ordered briefing in an Army case:WHETHER APPELLANT'S PLEAS TO ALL CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT PROVIDENT BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE DID NOT EXPLAIN THE DEFENSE OF LACK OF MENTAL RESPONSIBILITY TO APPELLANT, DID NOT SATISFY HERSELF THAT COUNSEL HAD EVALUATED THE VIABILITY OF THE DEFENSE, AND DID NOT ELICIT FACTS FROM APPELLANT THAT NEGATED THE DEFENSE.United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
My tentative assessment is that the Court has gutted the states' spending powers Exhibit A for this thesis is a comparison between the Court's opinion in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:52 am by sally
Regina (Modaresi) v Secretary of State for Health and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1359; [2011] WLR (D) 340 “The 14-day period allowed to a detained mental patient to lodge an application with the Mental Health Review Tribunal as provided by section 66 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and rule 32(1) the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008 was not to be considered to have expired where, though sent by fax on the last… [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:16 pm
 Interested in reading an 168-page, single-spaced opinion on the saga of the Central Valley and State Water Projects and their impact on the delta smelt and its habitat? [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 7:15 am
Supreme Court in argued cases: You can access today's ruling in Chambers v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by Mike Underwood
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:50 am by tracey
RB (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2012] EWCA Civ 277;  [2012] WLR (D)  77 “Analysis of an asylum seeker’s speech carried out by a private Swedish company was admissible in asylum proceedings although the analysts were allowed to remain anonymous and the presentation of the evidence did not comply in a number of respects with practice directions for the immigration and asylum chambers of the First-tier and Upper… [read post]