Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne"
Results 161 - 180
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
The Court appears to have applied the standard used in its 1969 Rumer v Evans holding: “‘[d]iscriminations of an unusual character especially require careful consideration. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
The Court appears to have applied the standard used in its 1969 Rumer v Evans holding: “‘[d]iscriminations of an unusual character especially require careful consideration. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
Can California employers break out the champagne? [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 8:19 am
Both Kats agree that, given the fact that there is a lot of money at stake, that the two parties have gone to court with much the same zest that a terrier would go for a postman's leg, and that there is a long-standing, generally well-respected convention of appealing extended passing off cases (think Vodkat, Advocaat, Chocosuisse, Champagne (Taittinger v Allbev)), this case may soon before the Court of Appeal -- but not before Lord Justice Briggs ... [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:02 am
USPTO Drops Idea of Moving Up Deadline for First Filing of Section 8 Declarations of UseThe TTAB Issued 42 Precedential Decisions in 2012Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Already v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:24 am
Comité Interprofessionel du Vin de Champagne and Institut National de l’Origine et de la Qualité v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:47 pm
C’est l’objet de la première partie dont l’approche transversale conduit à dégager les grandes lignes : elle révèle un tronc commun qui traduit l’unité de la matière et permet de mieux en comprendre l’esprit. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:40 am
That's why I love this case I taught yesterday in Environmental Law called Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:20 pm
The titillating tale unfolds in the Reasons for Judgment from the Quebec Superior Court in A. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:51 am
Gasque v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 6:58 am
He returned on November 4 with champagne and glasses, saying he was “moving to Florida”, but did not. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:34 am
The fracas that occurred when COPE was established indicates some expected difficulties with that process - see Tune in live for ANC v COPE name battle. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am
Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130 Société Anonyme des Manujactures de Glaces v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:06 pm
[iv] “Every other U.S. industry that has been deregulated, from trucking to telephones, has lowered prices for consumers without sacrificing quality,”[v] they further proclaimed. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 8:31 am
Stewart v Franmara Inc [2012] NZHC 683 (26 March 2012) Stewart v Franmara Inc no.2 [2012] NZHC 1771 (19 July 2012) Breach of confidence – Patent infringement –Jurisdiction – whether New Zealand court has jurisdiction to decide infringement, in the US, of a US patent, where ownership and validity are not at issue In what might be described as a ‘courageous’ ruling, a judge of the New Zealand High Court in Auckland has found, in Stewart v… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:08 am
Roger Fisher, Harvard Law Prof and Co-Author of ‘Getting To Yes’ http://ow.ly/dhE3t Analysis: Apple’s win dents Android’s standard-essential patent hopes http://ow.ly/dhEun How the Apple v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 4:27 pm
In consequence, there may be more canapes and Champagne for the rest of us. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Drinking while sitting at 2:21 He ordered champagne at the hotel (2:38) with Miss Manken but he walked in. [read post]
