Search for: "Chandler v. U.s"
Results 161 - 180
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2016, 4:45 pm
In that case, the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
Neifert-White Co., 390 U.S. 228, 232 (1968). [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
Neifert-White Co., 390 U.S. 228, 232 (1968). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:22 am
In KSR v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 11:22 pm
The Court cited State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
In Zapata v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:52 am
http://tinyurl.com/2e82fnb (Orange Legal Technologies) HP Exec Spills Huge Company Secret On LinkedIn Profile - http://tinyurl.com/3dcrndv (Matt Rosoff) ILTA London Reviewed - http://tinyurl.com/3vdztue (Joanna Goodman) IT Pros Cross-Examine Digital Evidence - http://tinyurl.com/3npm69z (Kim Davis) It's Time Users Demand Better Data Handling - http://tinyurl.com/3hflkfv (Scott Koegler) Lifecycle Management: Fixed v Dynamic Content - http://tinyurl.com/3pnj44s (James Watson) Myths,… [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 10:35 pm
Citing Brown v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Gerry of the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
Despite the pending mortgages, Suntrust lent me and my spouse approximately $760,000, with no money down (except for a $75 administrative fee), to purchase a second house in Chandler. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969). [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 5:20 am
, Chandler v Cape plc [2012] EWCA Civ 525.Tort, however, can be understood in two senses here. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
The greatest hurdle to expanded camera coverage, the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm
In another unpublished opinion, Gerber v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
