Search for: "Cheek v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am
That’s because, according to GLR, “the case marks the first time in the United States that a DNA search technique known as familial searching has led to an arrest in a homicide case. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
At the Conglomerate, Tamara Piety discusses the likely impact of Citizens United on a series of civil RICO cases filed by the United States against tobacco companies; petitions for certiorari in the case are currently before the Court. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:16 pm
At issue is whether the STB and the second respondent, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), complied with their obligations under § 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ensure that the proposed rail was "not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species" before approving the exemption. 16 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
United States Department of Transportation, 452 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 2006)(until final approval was granted on an application, there was “insufficient certainty about the facilities’ future construction and environmental consequences to include them in the cumulative impact calculus. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm
Each year, approximately 30,000 to 50,000 cases of hepatitis A occur in the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 6:33 am
Wade upholding state bans on abortion, but the model’s developer cautions that the result should be taken with “a huge grain of salt and perhaps a tongue in cheek. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
Several commenters have stated that men, gay men particularly, are at much greater cancer risk than the article says, for example. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 2:54 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals say no in Garcia-Torres v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
No, says the Indiana Court of Appeals in Garcia-Torres v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina has reached the same conclusion. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 2:59 pm
(A defendant has consented to have his case details made available, though he does not want to be personally identified.)In State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:50 pm
See Cheek v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:24 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 3:20 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
Video 3: Turner v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
" Cheek v. [read post]
