Search for: "Christopher S. Yoo" Results 161 - 180 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2023, 1:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now nearly three years old, has published 65 articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), Keith Whittington (Princeton, moving to Yale) (forthcoming), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment). [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now two years old, has published over fifty articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU, forthcoming within a week or so), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment). [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:55 pm by Dan Markel
Career Development Professor and Associate Professor of Marketing, MIT Sloan School of Management Christopher S. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:42 pm by Austen Parrish
 The claim is that American interests are strong when foreign conduct has an effect in the United States (see Bill Dodge's leading article on this topic). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Circuit upheld the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Open Internet Order, which reclassified broadband internet as a utility and created rules to prevent throttling of connection speeds and paid prioritization of traffic—the decision was hailed as “a victory for consumers and innovators” by FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler and, according to University of Pennsylvania law professor Christopher Yoo, who filed an amicus brief opposing the… [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 5:01 am
An alphabetical list of the 16 speakers and panelists is in footnote 1 below.[1] (Rest assured that the name John Yoo is not among them.) [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
And outside participants included still-familiar names, like Christopher Yoo, Tim Wu, and Gigi Sohn. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm by Cary Coglianese
She also joined with our esteemed colleague, Christopher Yoo, to organize a distinctive conference on standard-essential patents and the Microsoft v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
  These include useful treatments of individual trials, such as Valerie Hebert’s study of the High Command case, Hitler’s Generals on Trial, and Hilary Earl’s The Nuremberg SS-Einsatzgruppen Trial, 1945-1958. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
[Woolf’s A Room of Her Own. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 1 | Ellen Goodman (Rutgers), Moderator  Access and Development: The History of ‘Development’ and WIPOSara Bannerman (McMaster University)Commentator | Christopher S. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:04 am by Camilla Hrdy
  For example, Christopher Yoo and Joseph Fishman have justified the derivative works right on similar grounds, highlighting the benefits of exclusion for exclusion's sake. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 5:52 am by Eric Goldman
Dec. 22, 2022): the question boils down to whether ActiveProspect was an independent third party hired to eavesdrop on What If’s communications, or whether ActiveProspect’s software was merely a tool that What If used to record its own communications with plaintiff. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent article, Christopher Yoo, professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, and law student Alicia Lai took stock of the various federal initiatives currently under consideration that are aimed at regulating emerging artificial intelligence technologies. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
The Appellant was not given a proper opportunity to contest the ICT’s ruling and therefore could not amount to Hunter abuse. [read post]