Search for: "Citizens for Responsibility a v. FEC" Results 161 - 180 of 191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2010, 8:34 am by Beck, et al.
We have no intention of wading into the treacherous (and heated) debate about Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:30 am by Anna Christensen
  The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, CNN, and Politico all report on the new bill, which was introduced by Senator Charles Schumer and Representative Chris Van Hollen to mitigate the effects of Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am by Matt Sundquist
Last week, former FEC Commissioner Hans A. von Spakovsky (now affiliated with the Heritage Foundation) moderated a panel discussion, sponsored by the Heritage Foundation and the free speech and election law practice group of the Federalist Society, that examined the practical impact and potential outcomes of the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:53 am by Adam Chandler
Plans for a legislative response to the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:15 am by Matt Sundquist
” Elsewhere, commentators analyze how Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:46 am by Lyle Denniston
From the opening moment of the 65-minute hearing, most of the nine judges on the en banc Court treated the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am by Adam Chandler
Last Thursday's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am by Jay Willis
Commentators continue to weigh in on last Thursday's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:18 pm by Rusty Shackleford
Flurries of comments similar to the title of this entry made their way around the Internet today, after the Supreme Court decided Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm by Usha Rodrigues
Many have already weighed in on Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:45 pm by Lisa McElroy
" In other words, Justice Kennedy was responsible for expressing the views of the Court, not just his own. [read post]