Search for: "City of Providence v. First National Stores, Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 7 March 2023, the High Court of Australia revoked Facebook Inc’s special leave to appeal to the High Court in the case of Facebook Inc v Australian Information Commissioner & Anor [2023] HCATrans 22. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
City of Highland Park, 15-133, stuck around for its third re-list. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency with Super Store Industries (SSI), a Stockton, Calif. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am by INFORRM
Sensors in vehicles can provide drivers with critical information appearing on the windscreen. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
An employer who accesses any information that is password protected or otherwise not available to the public without the authorization of the potential employee will be subject to liability under the Stored Communications Act (SCA), which prohibits intentionally accessing or exceeding authorization to access a facility in which an electronic communication is provided and thereby obtaining access to an electronic communication stored in the system. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am by John Eastman
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., its application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to closely held corporations, and what the decision portends for the so-called accommodation for groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor that is currently being litigated. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
  After all, Covid-19 was the first global pandemic since 1919, and the conflict in Ukraine marks the first large-scale conventional conflict in Europe since World War II. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:03 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In the wake of last month’s Supreme Court ruling in Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc — where the Court held that the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage regulations violate the religious rights of closely held private corporations — some advocates feared that the new EO might contain a sweeping religious exemption. [read post]