Search for: "Clark v. Secretary of State"
Results 161 - 180
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
“The Secretary of Health and Human Services is not a State; so an Exchange established by the Secretary is not an Exchange established by the State; so people who buy insurance through such an Exchange get no money. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 1:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
Lord Hodge (with whom Lords Clarke, Wilson and Toulson agreed) held that the licences granted to ZH and CN were not licences to occupy premises as a dwelling. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
She was the recipient of the Washington State Judge of the Year Award in 2006 by the Washington State Association for Justice, given to her for the important ruling she made in the Clark County civil case of Magana v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
She was the recipient of the Washington State Judge of the Year Award in 2006 by the Washington State Association for Justice, given to her for the important ruling she made in the Clark County civil case of Magana v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Appeal The appeal that was heard last month had eight intervening parties, including the Secretary of State for Justice, the General Council of the Bar, The Law Society and the Association of Costs Lawyers, which reflects the wide-ranging interests in the outcome of this case (which is further reflected by the seven-judge panel). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
There was, however, no cross-examination of the Secretary of State’s key witness. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Government Ordered to Maintain Expensive Custom Database Shared with Criminal Defendant: In the criminal case of United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
United States (1985): In Diaz v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale, with Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed unanimously agreeing with her findings. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
In an opinion at CNN, Clark Jones argues that the country’s tough new terror laws could backfire. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
On Junuary 16, 2013 Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton stated as follows: U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
” Under United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Clark, 143 U.S. 649, 694 (1892); Panama, 293 U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
My name is Brian Clarke. [read post]
