Search for: "Clark v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2012, 11:15 am by Daniel E. Cummins
This defense was first found to be invalid in the Superior Court case of Pringle v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:51 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Supreme Court, without re-examining the evidence, affirmed after concluding that the Superior Court more or less got the standard correct. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:05 am by Bexis
  The Supreme Court, without re-examining the evidence, affirmed after concluding that the Superior Court more or less got the standard correct. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:43 pm by William A. Ruskin
  Although there were no New York cases directly on point, Judge Markey referenced a 2001 ruling in the Superior Court in Delaware in Clark v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:43 pm by William A. Ruskin
  Although there were no New York cases directly on point, Judge Markey referenced a 2001 ruling in the Superior Court in Delaware in Clark v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Superior Court, CA Supreme Court Addresses Work Privilege Product for Witness Statements – http://bit.ly/Ld4evC (Scott Leviant) Is Social Media Discoverable? [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Quite to the contrary, the Court held in Lucas…that the trial court must balance the state’s interest against the defendant’s interest on a case-by-case basis, and neither interest is superior per se. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court (Hohnbaum), 165 Cal.App.4th 25 (Jul. 22, 2008)? [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
Superior Court:  Does a court commissioner, acting without the consent of the parties, have authority to summarily deny a petition for writ of habeas corpus or a petition for writ of mandate? [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:23 pm by Steve Graham
Pierce County, a superior court in Washington will do a balancing test when faced with a request for an injunction. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm by PaulKostro
In this case, it is up to the Chancery Division to determine whether the claims asserted should be addressed in the Family Part or transferred to another Part or Division of the Superior Court as the matter proceeds. [read post]