Search for: "Cleary v. Cleary" Results 161 - 180 of 287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 3:18 am
If there is an IP licence, a liquidator might describe it as an onerous licence and disclaim it [says the IPKat, on a recent dispute involving this area, see Butters v BBC here]. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 11:44 am by Mitu Gulati
  By contrast, civil law jurisdictions such as France, the Netherlands and Spain, sometimes have such a clause baked into the civil law and also appear more willing seem much more willing to find such a provision implicit (for discussions of the common law v. civil law approaches, see these memos from White & Case and Cleary Gottlieb memos, here and here). [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 5:18 pm by Joy Waltemath
After the litigation process had dragged on for a while, the company brought a motion to compel discovery from the Secretary (Perez v El Tequila LLC, October 20, 2014, Cleary, P). [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Supp.2d 508 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 5:54 am
Cohen, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Sunday, February 5, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Disclosure, Earnings disclosure, Exchange Act, Filings, Financial reporting, IPOs, JOBS Act, Registration statements, Regulation S-K, SEC, Securities Act, Securities regulation, Small firms 2016 Developments in Securities and M&A Litigation Posted by Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Monday, February 6, 2017 Tags: Appraisal rights, Class actions, Delaware cases, Disclosure, Erica John Fund… [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:33 am by J
Not only was this rarely to be considered an appropriate course of action, but the LVTs additional reasons were simply wrong.Changing tack slightly, we then come on to Cleary and others v Lakeside Investments Ltd [2011] UKUT 264 (LC), an application to vary various leases under s.35(2)(3), Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:33 am by J
Not only was this rarely to be considered an appropriate course of action, but the LVTs additional reasons were simply wrong.Changing tack slightly, we then come on to Cleary and others v Lakeside Investments Ltd [2011] UKUT 264 (LC), an application to vary various leases under s.35(2)(3), Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:39 pm
 Holding The Court held that its conclusion was dictated by its decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]