Search for: "Cleary v. Cleary"
Results 161 - 180
of 287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2016, 8:45 am
Cleary. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:05 am
AFPDs Rachel Korenblat, Alina Shell and Amy Cleary. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 3:22 am
Here’s the intro from this Cleary Gottlieb blog: In a recent ruling (Halo Elecs., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:10 am
In Citigroup Inc., et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:10 pm
Cleary Help You? [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Saturday, May 28, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Arbitration, Banks, CFPB, Class actions, Consumer protection, Contracts, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial institutions, Financial regulation Fed, FDIC, and “Not Credible” Resolution Plans Posted by Michael Krimminger and Sean O’Neal, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Sunday, May 29, 2016 Tags: Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Code, Banks, FDIC, Federal Reserve, Financial… [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 6:10 am
Thus, while the Order clarifies a roadmap (set forth recently in Corwin v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am
The staff observed that, although there are some prescriptive and structured elements, the current requirements are largely principles-based, with disclosure determined on the basis of “materiality” as defined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am
The staff observed that, although there are some prescriptive and structured elements, the current requirements are largely principles-based, with disclosure determined on the basis of “materiality” as defined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm
In Hedges v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 6:48 pm
And finally, Part V proposes ways to modify and improve the current IPRs to protect ICH more efficiently. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:58 am
Thursday The Court is not sitting today, but judgment is being handed down in the joined criminal cases R v Jogee and R v Ruddock. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:57 am
Tuesday Today and tomorrow the Supreme Court is hearing the appeal in Patel v Mirza, a case concerning when illegal conduct prevents a claimant recovering money he has paid under a contract. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:17 am
In Miramar Police Officers’ Retirement Plan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:14 am
Last week, I only found the policy about proxy access… Amalgamated Bank Seeks Delaware Legislative Action to Curtail “Fee-Shifting” By-Laws This recent Amalgamated Bank letter calls for reforms in the wake of ATP Tour v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:24 pm
Cleary, it would not be appropriate to discuss this question with respect to any particular outstanding matters. [read post]
