Search for: "Cohen v. Davis"
Results 161 - 180
of 316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
The case I discuss below, Manuel v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
The Law of Facebook, UC Davis Law Review, Forthcoming, Ashutosh Avinash Bhagwat, University of California, Davis – School of Law. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 5:38 am
Attorneys, P.C. v Reich, Reich, & Reich, P.C., 144 AD3d 543 [1st Dept 2016]; Davis, 160 AD3d at 486). [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am
In a piece at Time, Adam Cohen offers detailed background on Skinner v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
My biweekly column slot this week roughly coincides with the beginning of the new academic year at most law schools across the country. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:02 pm
In non-affirmative action cases like Washington v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Davis, Keesha Davis, Matthew T. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:27 am
(See Aaron v Roemer. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:16 am
This claim fails because plaintiff’s various successor counsel had ample time and opportunity to make such a motion, and in fact one did (although it was purportedly abandoned) (see Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 487 [1st Dept 2018]).{**168 AD3d at 75} Even assuming AMS was negligent in failing to move for attorneys’ fees, by agreeing as part of the settlement[FN2] to forgo any award of attorneys’ fees except for $20,000, plaintiff… [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Last month’s ruling by the U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
In Buckley v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Silicon Valley billionaire investor Tim Draper recently unveiled a plan to divide up California into six separate states because, in his view, “California’s diverse population and economies [have] rendered the state nearly ungovernable. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Defendant concedes that a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) does not, without more, support a malpractice claim (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513 [1st Dept 2014] [citations omitted]). [read post]
