Search for: "Collins v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2020, 7:37 am
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
We focus first on the landmark 1813 case Queen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2025, 11:15 am
On March 28, 2025, the United States District Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am
The first was Collins v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:11 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:58 am
Section 2254(d)(2) of Title 28, United States Code provides federal habeas relief may not be granted on any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in the state courts unless the state court's adjudication of the claim resulted in a decision based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
United States, continued to keep Court watchers and commentators busy yesterday. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
(Civil Procedure) Collins v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 10:25 am
The Sixth Circuit offered up a major sentencing win for the defense today in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:13 am
Miranda rights suffer another setback in the United States Supreme Court case of Berghuis v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 11:06 am
The example is lightly modified from the facts in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:44 pm
United States, No. 16-1371. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
., the Court will hear argument in Altria Group v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:09 pm
One case highlighted is Gbarabe v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
On Monday, October 6, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review in Rainey v. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:09 am
In Gentile v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
The Court, explicitly recognizing the relationship between suggestiveness and mistakes in identification has repeatedly expressed concern that police arranged identification procedures may alter a witness’s memory rendering the subsequent identification testimony unreliable (United States v Wade, 388 US 218 [1967], Stovall v Denno, 388 US 293 [1967]; Simmons v United States, 390 US 377 [1968]; Manson v Braithwaite,… [read post]
