Search for: "Collins v. York" Results 161 - 180 of 503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2010, 7:25 am by Anna Christensen
Chicago and Cooper Industries v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The first amendment combined with the supreme court’s 1964 landmark case of New York Times v Sullivan means that the bar is set very high for celebrities or public figures who want to sue for defamation. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of Earl Warren and the Struggle for Justice (Lexington Books, 2015, pp. 360), by Wilmington College political science professor Paul Moke. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:59 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of The Supreme Court Sourcebook (Aspen, May 2013) by Richard H. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:05 am
"It is likely that renvoi is excluded from the New York Convention: see van den Berg, The New York Convention of 1958 (1981), p 291. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm by Venkat
My Five Takeaways From the Trial (by Jordan Rushie, who represented one of the Doe defendants) Related posts: P2P Infringement Lawyer Faces Possible Sanctions For Disregarding Court Order Regarding Subpoenas – In re: Bittorrent Adult Film Copyright Infringement CasesNew York Judge *Slams* Bittorrent Copyright Plaintiffs – K-Beech; Malibu Media; and Patrick Collins v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh looks at Madison v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Geoffrey Stone and David Strauss in connection with their new book, “Democracy and Equality: The Enduring Constitutional Vision of the Warren Court” (Oxford University Press, 2020). [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Baron & ors v Collins and Baron & ors v Vines, heard 20 April 2015 (Warby J). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 14 December 2023 there was a set aside application in the case of McGee v Lewis before Collins Rice J. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Ronald Collins
Question: In a recent essay in the New York Review of Books, Jonathan Stevenson wrote: “Over the past forty-five years, the effective scope of the [War Powers Act] has remained more or less the same. [read post]