Search for: "Com. v. Bille, D."
Results 161 - 180
of 231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2010, 2:40 pm
Regardless, CSM left the question open-ended, either becuase they don’t buy that notion or they wanted to suggest to respondents that it’s actually an open question (as if site operators are just lying about having to pay their bills somehow!) [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:39 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:05 am
Frankly, I’d expected to pay about half that, but had not considered the scarcity of options which, as you economists know, tends to push up the cost. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
The main issue here was Givaudan’s assertion that all its dealings with SS&D were covered by attorney-client privilege; thus, for example, SS&D couldn’t hire an expert to review its billings to Givaudan to determine if they were reasonable and proper. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, would be sending a letter of recommendation for Rost as well as several other candidates for the post. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:46 am
Back in June, in State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 9:11 am
Small Firm Practice v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm
MISAT (6) , Owusu v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
Zyxel Coms. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:49 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
And paying more attention in math class might have helped, too: that way, you wouldn’t submit assigned counsel fee bills showing you’d worked 3,431 hours in a single year. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am
A couple of weeks ago, we reported on a bit of a bedbug breakout in the Brooklyn D.A. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Overview of SB 250 (From YesOnSB250.com) SB 250 does not outlaw unaltered animals. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:51 am
In State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:42 am
When I’d discussed the 8th District’s decision, I’d said I thought the dissent had a better argument, and last week, in State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
(d); Civ. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:39 am
For all this they billed over $31,000, or almost four times what she’d received in unemployment benefits, and then sued her for the balance of $9,000 in fees she owed. [read post]
