Search for: "Commonwealth v. England"
Results 161 - 180
of 207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2025, 10:07 pm
Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
In Al-Haq, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2009] EWHC 1910 (Admin), the High Court was asked to condemn the 2008/9 Gaza conflict, effectively ruling it unlawful. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The possibility of a special defence for bloggers was considered by Hugh Tomlinson QC at the 4 November 2010 conference in England on defamation law reform: “The second possible area for the development of a new defence relates to bloggers and others who produce material on the internet, often with fairly limited readerships, but who face the possibility of ruinously expensive libel actions. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am
We don’t have a Human Rights Act but we are signatories to the International Covenant of Civil Rights – civil and political rights – which is where we say the Commonwealth gets its power to legislate and that does protect both freedom of expression and privacy. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:45 am
Benjamin Curtis – in his capacity as an attorney in Boston – argued in the 1836 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am
Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am
Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:10 pm
The new kidnapping offence would be committed where a person, D: without lawful authority or reasonable excuse; intentionally uses force or the threat of force; in order to take another person V, or otherwise cause them to move in his company. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 8:44 am
However, a landmark 2010 ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Papadopoulos v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Take, for example, the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Wilder v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 5:26 am
New England Tel. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
These rulings led to a court case in England brought by three WSC players, backed by Packer, that lasted for seven weeks. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm
Brown v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:54 am
At least in England, damages have become a big issue inosfar as agreements on jurisdiction can be regarded as ordinary contract terms and their breach would thus amount to a breach of contract. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Consider that in 1924, the year Forster published A Passage to India, with its depiction of how British colonial rule in India distorted human relationships, the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted its Racial Integrity Act (a “modern” version of its centuries old antimiscegenation law), struck down four decades later in Loving v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
