Search for: "Commonwealth v. Person, S."
Results 161 - 180
of 2,373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2019, 11:16 am
The Appeals Court reversed the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress items seized pursuant to a warrantless search of his motor vehicle in Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:44 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:44 am
On Monday in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:32 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 1:58 pm
Barnes and Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 10:13 pm
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:49 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 12:23 pm
In its decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 12:23 pm
In its decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
So I typed "Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:22 am
In the case of Turner v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 3:43 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 11:35 am
The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently looked at the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 6:01 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
So I typed "Commonwealth v. [read post]
In Massachusetts the spirit of restraining orders must be obeyed as well as the letter of the order.
3 Nov 2018, 12:20 pm
Any intentional contact that causes the protected person to see the defendant may be considered to be a violation of the order.In Commonwealth v Goldman, the Court explained what “stay away” in a restraining order means. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
In Calhoun Jewelers, LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:59 am
In Commonwealth v Diaz Perez, the Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the allowance of the defendant’s motion for a new trial, agreeing with the trial court judge that the failure of the defendant’s successor trial counsel to investigate a crucial alibi witness, who had testified at an earlier mistrial, constituted ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
