Search for: "Condon v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2021, 5:51 am
Plaintiff also sues under the state law prohibiting discrimination, though it does not distinguish between the state and city laws in its analysis.The case is Doe v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:41 pm
There'll be a spectacular Epic Games v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
From United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:12 pm
The Constitutional Court in State Information Technology Agency Soc Limited v Gijima Holdings (Pty) Ltd held that a state applicant seeking the judicial review of their own decision may not rely on the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 2000 and must do so in terms of the principle of legality. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
Louis v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:28 pm
” Citing a related case in a different regulated profession in Erdmann v Complaints Inquiry Committee, the Discipline Committee effectively stated, [20] Professionals in every walk of life have private lives and should enjoy, as much as possible, the rights and freedoms of citizens generally. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Maryland and Giglio v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 12:15 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 10:19 am
Lemon v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 3:28 pm
Brown PLLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 8:42 am
The secondkind is where the persecution is carried out or condoned by a public or private, non-state actor, such as Governments, or militant groupswho specifically subject women of an ethnicity to sexual violence or subjugation. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
Tabatha Abu El-HajIn my last post, I suggested that McKesson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm
Northern Bottling Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
Yesterday I reported on a courtroom insanity of potentially pathological proportions in Munich (Nokia v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
In Ndlovu v Member of the Executive Council for Police, Roads and Transport: Free State Province [2020 JDR 0340 FB] the notice was served 10 months and six days after the date of the incident that caused the action and bizarrely an application for condonation was only instituted five years later. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The destination state may, for example, have an ‘adequacy decision’ that means that the state in question ensures an adequate (roughly equivalent) level of protection to the ensured by the GDPR (Article 45 GDPR). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:22 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Usually the Fifth Circuit is given credit for creating the exception in 1972, in McClure v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
In State v. [read post]
